Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01893
Original file (BC 2014 01893.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF: 	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01893

					COUNSEL:  NONE

		HEARING DESIRED:  NO 



APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His entry-level separation with uncharacterized service be changed or upgraded.


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

An upgrade is justified by the Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of 2C (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry-level separation without characterization of service), as reflected on his AF IMT 100.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant initially entered the Regular Air Force on 01 Oct 13.

On 21 Jan 14, the applicant’s commander notified him of his intent to recommend his entry-level separation for unsatisfactory duty performance; specifically, failure to make satisfactory progress in military training or for performance of primary duties.  The reason for this action is that on or about 7 Jan 14, the applicant self-eliminated from the Explosive Ordinance Disposal (EOD) Preliminary Course.  The applicant acknowledged receipt of the notification and was afforded the opportunity to consult with legal counsel.  The base legal office reviewed the discharge and found it legally sufficient.

According to the applicant’s AF IMT 100, Request and Authorization for Separation, the pending RE code reflected was 2C, based on the type of separation.

On 24 Jan 14, the applicant was furnished an entry-level separation with uncharacterized service, issued an RE code of 2C, and credited with 3 months and 24 days of total active service.

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice.  Airmen are given entry–level separation/uncharacterized service when separation is initiated in the first 180 days of continuous active service.  The Department of Defense (DoD) determined if a member served less than 180 days continuous service, it would be unfair to the member and the service to characterize their limited service.  The applicant self-eliminated from his training course which constituted failure to make satisfactory progress in a required training program.  Therefore, the Separation Program Designator (SPD) code and narrative reason for separation are correct and in accordance with DoD and Air Force instructions.

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit C.

AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice.  The applicant received an RE code of 2C, based on his entry-level separation with uncharacterized service as required by AFI 36-2606, Reenlistments in the USAF.

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit D.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 18 Aug 14 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit E).  As of this date, no response has been received by this office.


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice.  While the applicant contends that his discharge should be upgraded because he was issued a reentry (RE) code of 2C, we do not find this argument sufficient to conclude that corrective action is warranted.  In this respect, we note the comments of AFPC/DPSOA indicating that AFI 36-2606, Reenlistments in the USAF, indicates that the RE code the applicant received is the appropriate code for his circumstance.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief.


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-01893 in Executive Session on 28 Jan 15, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	

The following documentary evidence was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 28 Apr 14, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSOR, dated 26 Jun 14.
	Exhibit D.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 21 Jul 14.
Exhibit E.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 18 Aug 14.

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01755

    Original file (BC-2012-01755.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01755 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of 2C, which denotes "Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service," be changed to allow reentry in the military. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03239

    Original file (BC 2013 03239.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03239 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2C (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to RE Code 1 so that he can be eligible to rejoin the military. The only available RE Code a...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05451

    Original file (BC 2013 05451.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05451 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) Code of 2C (entry-level separation with uncharacterized service) be changed to one which will allow him to reenlist in the Air Force. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05662

    Original file (BC 2013 05662.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05662 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her service characterization, as reflected in Block 24 of her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed from “not applicable” to “honorable.” APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The Reentry (RE) Code 2C gives her an “honorable” status, so it should be reflected in Block 24. The remaining...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00970

    Original file (BC 2014 00970.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00970 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of 2C which denotes “Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service” be changed to allow him to reenlist in the Air Force. On 10 Jan 13, his commander recommended he be given an entry level discharge for mental disorders under...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02873

    Original file (BC 2014 02873.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 24 Jul 13, the action was found to be legally sufficient and the discharge authority concurred with the commander’s recommendation and directed the applicant’s entry level separation with uncharacterized service. As of this date, no response has been received by this office. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02797

    Original file (BC 2013 02797.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02797 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) and separation program designator (SPD) codes be revised to allow him the opportunity for reenlistment into the Air Force or other military service. The applicant received an involuntary discharge with a narrative reason for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05611

    Original file (BC 2013 05611.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 22 Nov 13, after serving four months and seven days, the applicant was furnished an ELS with uncharacterized service, and issued an RE Code of 2C and Narrative Reason for Separation of “Entry Level Performance or Conduct.” The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are described in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is included at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02675

    Original file (BC 2013 02675.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A waiver of the RE code “2C” from recruiting services based on the medical community’s recommendation of meeting medical requirements would be more appropriate than granting a reenlistment eligible RE code since the applicant did not provide any evidence of an error or injustice in her discharge. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04109

    Original file (BC-2012-04109.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04109 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of 4C (failure to meet physical standards for enlistment) be changed to a code that will allow him to reenlist in the military. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant’s...